Résumé: For many jellyfish, the magnitude and timing of medusae blooms are recognized to result from the benthic stage dynamics. However, information on the scyphistomae of jellyfish populations in the wild remains scarce. Here, bi-mensual underwater photoquadrat surveys were combined with scyphistomae sampling and observation to describe the annual (February 2017–January 2018) benthic stage dynamics and asexual reproduction strategy of Aurelia coerulea in the Thau lagoon (43°25′31.1″N; 03°42′0.9″E). Our results revealed unexpected seasonal patterns of variation: scyphistoma coverage peaked in the spring (11.6 ± 3.7% on 21st April) and was minimal in the summer and autumn (1.4 ± 1.3% on 10th October). The increase in scyphistoma coverage mainly resulted from an intense production of buds between February and April during the spring rise in water temperature (peak of 12,800 buds m−2 on 21st April), but scyphistoma coverage appeared to be negatively influenced by the interaction of high summer temperatures and salinities. Strobilation was observed from November to April. It peaked on 17th November, with 33.1% of the scyphistomae strobilating and an average production of 19,100 strobila disks m−2. However, the low scyphistoma coverage at this time of the year (< 2%) likely limited the intensity of ephyrae liberation and the subsequent medusae bloom. The final population size of A. coerulea thus results from a complex interaction of abiotic and biotic factors. Our results bring into question how the different populations of Aurelia spp. will respond to the predicted global warming scenarios.

Résumé: Rivers are known to be major contributors to eutrophication in marine coastal waters, but little is known on the short-term impact of freshwater surges on the structure and functioning of the marine plankton community. The effect of adding river water, reducing the salinity by 15 and 30%, on an autumn plankton community in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Thau Lagoon, France) was determined during a 6-day mesocosm experiment. Adding river water brought not only nutrients but also chlorophyceans that did not survive in the brackish mesocosm waters. The addition of water led to initial increases (days 1-2) in bacterial production as well as increases in the abundances of bacterioplankton and picoeukaryotes. After day 3, the increases were more significant for diatoms and dinoflagellates that were already present in the Thau Lagoon water (mainly Pseudo-nitzschia spp. group delicatissima and Prorocentrum triestinum) and other larger organisms (tintinnids, rotifers). At the same time, the abundances of bacterioplankton, cyanobacteria, and picoeukaryote fell, some nutrients (NH4 (+), SiO4 (3-)) returned to pre-input levels, and the plankton structure moved from a trophic food web based on secondary production to the accumulation of primary producers in the mesocosms with added river water. Our results also show that, after freshwater inputs, there is rapid emergence of plankton species that are potentially harmful to living organisms. This suggests that flash flood events may lead to sanitary issues, other than pathogens, in exploited marine areas.

Résumé: 1 – Phytoplankton observations are commonly used to contribute to the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health and their trophic status. Compared to other methods, chemotaxonomic analysis based on High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) presents many advantages (e.g., rapidity, reproducibility, and capacity to include pigments from all cell sizes), but its use in coastal lagoons studies is still not very common. The method of Wright et al., (1991) recommended by the UNESCO (Jeffrey et al., 1997) and most frequently used for phytoplankton analysis in coastal lagoons, so far, was selected and compared to the more novel method of Hagerthey et al. (2006). 2 – The two methods that differed slightly with respect to their solvent gradients during chromatography (mobile phase) and column (stationary phase), were tested using a pigment mix from DHI Water and Environment comprising 30 different pigments. Extraction methods were tested using replicates of 1l of sub-surface water from the Thau lagoon (South of France), sampled in June 2013. Optimization of the extraction was performed by testing different volumes of solvent (2 to 5 ml), different solvents based on a mix of methanol, acetone, dimethylformamide, water, compared to acetone 90% and pure methanol, as well as different extraction times (10 min to 2 h), and the addition of the ion-pairing agent tetrabutyl ammonium acetate hydroxide (TBAA). 3 – The second method of analysis allowed better separation and resolution of most of the pigments, especially of lutein and zeaxanthin. The early-eluting most polar pigments and the more hydrophobic pigments eluting in the end of the chromatogram (chlorophylls and carotenoids) showed also better separation and peak shapes. 5 mL of the mix of acetone/ methanol/ water (45:45:10) allowed the best extraction of the pigments. The use of TBAA showed negative effects. 4 – For pigment analysis in coastal lagoon, our final protocol used 1 h extraction with 5 mL of acetone/ methanol/ water, and analysis with the gradient from Hagerthey et al. (2006). On our analytical equipment it needed some adjustments. It uses a longer chromatography run and quantified the phytoplankton pigment markers better than the method of Wright et al. (1991).